2025 has delivered a series of powerful—and practical—employment law decisions. These five cases carry direct lessons for every California employer, especially in areas where minor missteps can lead to major liability.
1. Iloff v. Bridgeville Properties, Inc. – California Supreme Court (2025) – “Good Faith” Requires Real Effort
This case involved a handyman who performed
Quick Story:
An HR lead recently ran a simple 30-minute spot audit and uncovered two issues—meal breaks were routinely starting late at one location, and a manager at another location was unsure whether employees needed to record 10-minute rest breaks. Small corrections, but they prevented what could have escalated into a costly PAGA claim, potentially
California employers continue to face heavy scrutiny and litigation regarding their meal and rest break practices. Since the Brinker Restaurant Group v. Superior Court decision in 2012, courts have reaffirmed that compliance is measured by strict timing rules, not just having written policies in place. Here are five key reminders on the timing requirements and
Recently, while recording a podcast, I found myself talking about something I’ve been thinking about for a long time: how much harder HR is than people give it credit for.
We tend to see HR as “soft” compared to the other seats in the C-suite. CFOs, COOs, and CTOs have hard numbers and clear metrics.
Over the summer, I like to expand my reading list into different topics. This year I discovered Rory Sutherland and his book Alchemy: The Power of Ideas That Don’t Make Sense. Sutherland is a British marketing executive and vice chairman of Ogilvy, but his insights go far beyond advertising. His book weaves together ideas
Mediation is all about finding common ground. As I discussed in my prior article, Mediation in Litigation: Five Key Tips for Success, employers can approach mediation far more effectively when they understand not only what mediation is, but also the tools that may be used during the process. One of the most common —
In today’s employment climate, workforce scheduling isn’t just an operational issue—it’s a legal one. With increasing scrutiny over wage and hour practices, California employers must understand the boundaries when it comes to scheduling flexibility. While California has not adopted “predictive scheduling” mandates on a statewide level, that doesn’t mean employers are in the clear. Local
AI is no longer just a buzzword—it’s actively transforming the workplace. Whether employers are aware of it or not, AI tools are being embedded into daily operations across industries. With California pushing forward with proposed regulations that could take effect as early as July 1, 2025, employers must begin understanding the implications now. Here are
The ramping up of enforcement by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) across California has been expected for some time now. We have hosted multiple webinars earlier this year with this expectation, and now is a good time to review the materials again. What we’re seeing now is not a surprise, and the focus on employer
California employers were required by February 14, 2024, under AB 1076, to notify employees bound by noncompetition agreements that these agreements are void and unenforceable—unless a statutory exception applies. With this update to California law, many employers are rightly asking:
How can employers still protect their business interests, proprietary information, and customer relationships