<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Employee Misclassification Prevention Act - California Employment Law Report</title>
<link>http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/articles/california-legislation-update/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:45:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:55:08 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Proposed Bill Targets Employers&apos; Classification of Independent Contractors</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The US House of Representatives introduced a bill <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.5107:">(H.R. 5107), Employee Misclassification Prevention Act</a>, that if passed would amend the FLSA to required employers who employ &ldquo;non-employees&rdquo; to keep records of classification of the non-employees.  The bill refers to non-employees, which is targeting employers&rsquo; classification of independent contractors.</p>
<p>Should the employer fail to maintain the records required under the proposed bill, a presumption would be created that the worker is an employee &ndash; not an independent contractor.  The employer could only then overturn this presumption by presenting &ldquo;clear and convincing evidence&rdquo; that the worker is properly classified.</p>
<p>The bill would also require employers to provide written notice to any non-employees about their classification.  Among other items, the notice would need to state:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Your rights to wage, hour, and other labor protections depend upon your proper classification as an employee or non-employee. If you have any questions or concerns about how you have been classified or suspect that you may have been misclassified, contact the U.S. Department of Labor.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The notice would also need to include additional information that Department of Labor deems necessary by regulation at a later date.</p>
<p>Violation of the proposed bill&rsquo;s requirements carries a civil fine of $1,100 per worker, which could increase to $5,000 for willful repeat violations.</p>
<p><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.5107:">The bill (H.R. 5107) can be read here</a>. From what I could gather, it appears that the bill has a strong chance of becoming law.  This is definitely one I will be keeping my eye on in coming months.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2010/05/articles/california-legislation-update/proposed-bill-targets-employers-classification-of-independent-contractors/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2010/05/articles/california-legislation-update/proposed-bill-targets-employers-classification-of-independent-contractors/</guid>
<category>California Legislation Update</category><category>Employee Misclassification Prevention Act</category><category>FLSA</category><category>Wage &amp; Hour Law</category><category>independent contractors</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:45:47 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anthony Zaller</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
