<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>background checks - California Employment Law Report</title>
<link>http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/articles/best-practices/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:21:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:36:02 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Spokeo.com makes on-line social networking searches for job applicants easier and faster</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Human resource professionals and hiring managers have <img width="225" height="300" align="right" src="http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/uploads/image/large row of files.jpg" alt="" />developed a better way to gain insight into new hire&rsquo;s backgrounds: information posted in social networking sites.  About two years ago, I was often asked whether it was legal to google a job applicant, or to review his or her information posted on the Internet.  While some lawyers took the conservative approach to this &ldquo;new technology&rdquo;, it has become common practice to search applicant&rsquo;s backgrounds on the Internet (see this <a href="http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2009/04/articles/best-practices/california-appellate-court-holds-postings-on-myspacecom-are-not-private/">post about Court's ruling that MySpace postings are not private</a>).&nbsp; I&rsquo;ve <a href="http://www.vtzlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/employee-handbooks/can-an-employer-be-liable-for-not-googling-a-job-applicant/">even made the case before that failure to do a simple Internet check could create liability for a company </a>if the result could have easily informed the company that the applicant had a bad history.&nbsp;</p>
<p>However, there are two basic problems now: (1) there are too many sites to search, and (2) if someone has a common name it is impossible to narrow the search to that particular person. &nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spokeo.com/single">Spokeo.com</a> is a new company that basically makes these on-line background checks easier.  <a href="https://www.openforum.com/idea-hub/topics/the-world/article/how-to-figure-out-if-youre-dealing-with-a-nutcase-guy-kawasaki">Guy Kawasaki points out</a> that this service can be very beneficial to an HR manager who is tasked with checking out applicants&rsquo; backgrounds by searching social networking sites.  The key break through for the website is that it searches for an individual&rsquo;s email address.  This makes it very helpful to find particular information about an applicant that has a common name.</p>
<p><strong>What is the cost?</strong></p>
<p>It is $2.95 per month for one year, or $4.95 per month for three months.  This seems well worth the cost to save hours searching social networking sites.</p>
<p>To try the service, <a href="http://www.spokeo.com/single">click here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Related articles:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2009/06/articles/technology-law/job-applicants-asked-to-provide-their-passwords-to-social-networking-sites/">Job Applicants Asked To Provide Their Passwords To Social Networking Sites</a></p>
<p><br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2009/08/articles/best-practices/spokeocom-makes-online-social-networking-searches-for-job-applicants-easier-and-faster/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2009/08/articles/best-practices/spokeocom-makes-online-social-networking-searches-for-job-applicants-easier-and-faster/</guid>
<category>Best Practices For California Employers</category><category>Internet</category><category>background checks</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:21:08 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anthony Zaller</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>