<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>California Legislation Update - California Employment Law Report</title>
<link>http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/articles/california-legislation-update/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:45:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:35:11 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Proposed Bill Targets Employers&apos; Classification of Independent Contractors</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The US House of Representatives introduced a bill <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.5107:">(H.R. 5107), Employee Misclassification Prevention Act</a>, that if passed would amend the FLSA to required employers who employ &ldquo;non-employees&rdquo; to keep records of classification of the non-employees.  The bill refers to non-employees, which is targeting employers&rsquo; classification of independent contractors.</p>
<p>Should the employer fail to maintain the records required under the proposed bill, a presumption would be created that the worker is an employee &ndash; not an independent contractor.  The employer could only then overturn this presumption by presenting &ldquo;clear and convincing evidence&rdquo; that the worker is properly classified.</p>
<p>The bill would also require employers to provide written notice to any non-employees about their classification.  Among other items, the notice would need to state:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Your rights to wage, hour, and other labor protections depend upon your proper classification as an employee or non-employee. If you have any questions or concerns about how you have been classified or suspect that you may have been misclassified, contact the U.S. Department of Labor.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The notice would also need to include additional information that Department of Labor deems necessary by regulation at a later date.</p>
<p>Violation of the proposed bill&rsquo;s requirements carries a civil fine of $1,100 per worker, which could increase to $5,000 for willful repeat violations.</p>
<p><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.5107:">The bill (H.R. 5107) can be read here</a>. From what I could gather, it appears that the bill has a strong chance of becoming law.  This is definitely one I will be keeping my eye on in coming months.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2010/05/articles/california-legislation-update/proposed-bill-targets-employers-classification-of-independent-contractors/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2010/05/articles/california-legislation-update/proposed-bill-targets-employers-classification-of-independent-contractors/</guid>
<category>California Legislation Update</category><category>Employee Misclassification Prevention Act</category><category>FLSA</category><category>Wage &amp; Hour Law</category><category>independent contractors</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:45:47 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anthony Zaller</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Politicians Closer To CA Budget Deal - No Changes To Meal &amp; Rest Break Laws</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the California state politicians are close to finalizing a budget deal in Sacramento by this Friday.  The Governor placed everything on the table during these negotiations, including attempting to bring some relief to businesses in regards to the <a href="http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/FAQ_MealPeriods.htm">meal and rest break laws</a> and even revising California&rsquo;s requirements that <a href="http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2009/02/articles/wage-hour-law/rules-to-avoid-paying-overtime-for-makeup-time/">overtime </a>is owed for all work performed over 8 hours in a day.  However, by many reports it appears that there will be no change to the current meal and rest break laws, or the overtime requirements.</p>
<p>Many California businesses have been sued in wage and hour class actions alleging that they have not properly administered meal and rest breaks.  Employers face large amounts of liability in these class actions in the form of premium pay of one hour of pay at the employee&rsquo;s regular rate of pay for each violation for a period of four years.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20090212/NEWS/902120351/1350?Title=Tentative_state_budget__Major_cuts__tax_hikes">Press Democrat also reports</a> that the deal will increase taxes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Vehicle license fees would nearly double, going from the current rate of 0.65 percent to 1.15 percent of the value of a car or truck.<br />
The sales tax would increase by 1 cent. Gas taxes would increase by 12 cents a gallon.<br />
Californians would pay a new surcharge on their personal income taxes, amounting to 2.5 percent of their total tax bills. The state's dependent credit would be cut in half, raising taxes for parents and those who take care of elders.<br />
The new and increased taxes would remain in effect for at least two years.<br />
&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2009/02/articles/california-legislation-update/politicians-closer-to-ca-budget-deal-no-changes-to-meal-rest-break-laws/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/2009/02/articles/california-legislation-update/politicians-closer-to-ca-budget-deal-no-changes-to-meal-rest-break-laws/</guid>
<category>California Legislation Update</category><category>Class Actions</category><category>Meal &amp; Rest Breaks</category><category>Wage &amp; Hour Law</category><category>meal and rest breaks</category><category>new legislation</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:36:00 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anthony Zaller</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>