Technology Revolution For The Legal Field

The talk around the Internet these days is all about how times are changing and how someone actually found a use for Twitter.  Technology has already changed the legal profession, but we have just barely taken full advantage of the gains that the legal profession can obtain.  I believe we are on the cusp of a major revolution in the legal field, and here are my predictions about how technology will change the legal profession within the next ten years:

Courts

  • New complaints will be published on the Internet, and companies (and individuals) can establish RSS feeds to allow them if they have been sued.
  • Google will index all case law.  This will directly compete with LexisNexis and Westlaw, allowing attorneys to conduct research at a fraction of the costs charged by these two companies. People will post comments about the opinions within the opinions themselves on the Internet. I am sure this would be more helpful than Westlaw’s Keycite.
  • Parties will be able to serve papers via email or through the Internet.  Sound far fetched?  A court in Australlia recently allowed a party to perform substitute service via Facebook.  Service by email is probably more secure than traditional mail anyway.
  • Attorneys will make routine court appearances via the Internet.
  • Voice recognition software will instantaneously transcribe court proceedings and depositions. This would eliminate a huge litigation cost – court reporters. I have nothing against court reporters, but they need to change their business model just like the music industry.
  • Attorneys will utilize technology in trials to make multi-media presentations to keep jurors’ attention and more persuasive cases for their clients. Trials, however, will not be conducted remotely over the Internet – attorneys need to be in the same room when presenting to the jurors.
  • The court system will become a paperless system. Parties will be required to file documents electronically. Courts will issue orders via email or posting on the Internet (attorneys will be able to subscribe via RSS feeds). Courts will not issue a single piece of paper, nor will they store a single piece of paper - saving a huge amount of money in terms of storage and labor in maintaining the files.  

Lawyers

  • Law firms will also move to paperless offices. It is necessary that the courts make this move first to give the lawyers opportunities to file documents electronically.
  • Law firms will make files available on-line for clients.
  • Lawyers will conduct webinars to train clients.
  • Small firms with specialized attorneys will come to dominate the legal field. Small firms can collaborate through the internet, and have equal (if not more) resources than large law firms. Large law firms are simply a group of various attorneys with different specializations using the same letterhead - and carrying a lot of overhead.

Clients

  • Will demand that their attorneys have a blog (or the newest way of publishing content on the Internet) in order to truly see that the lawyer understands the particular area of law the case involves and to see how the lawyer thinks.
  • Clients will demand that their lawyers understand how to use the internet to conduct background research on the opposition.
  • Clients will demand that their lawyers are utilizing technology to provide legal services more efficiently.

UPDATE:  The Complex Litigator just blogged about Alameda Court streaming a live feed for a jury trial in a complex personal injury case.  The case will be available through www.courtroomlive.com, and of course will be indexed for viewing at any time.  This leads me to another bullet point under how lawyers could use technology to improve their litigation skills: to review and improve their courtroom skills after a trial. 

 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/admin/trackback/105347
Comments (2) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Gabe Wachob - January 22, 2009 2:49 PM

Hi Anthony-
I think you're pretty much right. Though, I'm not sure Google will ever compete with the traditional electronic legal publisher services, because Google, for the most part, performs automated indexing and doesn't do structured information search and retrieval. That is, Google is not in the business of providing search on fields such as circuit, issue, cases cited, etc. There will always be a space for niche search/retrieval in the legal domain.
Now, the future players may be different that Lexis/Nexis and Westlaw -- we may not have even heard of them. But I don't think its going to be Google, unless they intend to change course and get into more vertical search...

Sydney Lawyer - May 8, 2010 4:13 AM

I think it is positive that some elements of the legal system are showing a capacity to adapt and change to new technological developments. Apparently most Australians now spent an average of 10 hours a week on Facebook so it is logical that this can be used as a valid medium to the service of legal documents as it is now in such regular usage that it is known to most people as a reliable method of communication.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.